The logic of no deal
We find
ourselves in interesting times with the epic failure of Teresa Mays rightly
derided deal. The government is unable to get this deal through the House of
Commons and has been forced to reach out to Labour to find common ground and
get a deal over the line.
This is
actually a trap to push Labour into accepting responsibility for a bad or no
deal. The irony being that due to the nature of EU law the only part that is legally
binding is the Withdrawal agreement (WA) treaty whereas the Political declaration
(PD) is non-binding and largely irrelevant. So everyone is running around trying
to change something that can and will be changed soon anyway. All roads in my
mind now point to an election regardless if the WA is passed or not.
There is
no way that this government will survive until 2022 or even the summer.
Putting
that all to one side what are the options facing the UK and EU and what are the
advantages and disadvantages to them both long and short term.
There
are three potential outcomes regardless of any extensions, referendums or elections.
Revoke
The UK could
unilaterally revoke Article 50 as confirmed by the European Court of Justice in
a ruling in December 2018 (Link) – this is the nuclear option. Currently I do not see
a likelihood of this, but things are moving at a rapid rate.
This
would deal with the short-term problems of Brexit with the UK remaining a
member of the EU.
Medium to
longer term though it becomes more damaging for both the UK and the EU with 50%
of the population now hardened Eurosceptics (A lot now genuinely really hate
the EU) whom would likely elect greater numbers Eurosceptic MEPs which would join
the likely swelling ranks from other countries elected in the forthcoming European
Parliament (EP) elections (Link). This would be
a massive headache of the EU making business even more difficult to conduct.
Beyond
that any UK political party that wants to get elected is going to find it needs to run on at least a partial Eurosceptic message due to the way that constituencies are distributed. This means that the UK government would likely be
unable to agree to much in Brussels. The UK also now has a constitutional break written
into law meaning a referendum would have to be held for any treaty change. This
is a problem as the Eurozone desperately needs root and branch reform and this would require the treaties to be reopened if it ever happens.
Withdrawal
agreement
The UK
signs the WA and moves towards stage two which is the trade negotiations.
This government
is going to fall in the next few months and so we will have an election. There
is a high likelihood both major parties will be punished in this election due
to their behavior and there will be a surge in voters either plumping for Eurosceptic
parties or not voting.
This
will be especially noticeable within the North and Conservative shires making
both Labour and the Tories nervous. This will demonstrate the difficulty of winning
an election without leave voters due to constituency boundaries and the fact
that most remain voters are concentrated in the major cities and university
towns.
In my opinion
the next election will also return a very close / hung parliament potentially
even a minority government which will make talks difficult (Link). This will become
especially true as the EU due to hubris will start piling up demands that no UK
government can accept. These will revolve around Northern Ireland (NI), fishing
and Gibraltar (Link).
There is
a high likelihood that this will lead to an abrogation crisis in a few years (Link). There
is no way that this could happen without economic and security ties being affected
and smarter people in the European Union have started to realise this.
No deal
Though
no side wants this it is probably the best option.
It would
create a clean break - the UK is out, and we will not be impacting the EU
internally as it struggles with populism and its many other splits. The EU is now
desperate for us not to stay for the EP elections for this very reason.
From the
UK perspective it would force the country to move on from the referendum and
push the conversation to what relationship we do want with the EU. This creates
a form of stability for the UK as we have left – no going back without much
negotiation and certainly not in the short to medium term.
In a no
deal environment both parties would be pushed to sustain trading and security ties
due to the volume of treaties and agreements which would need to be ratified. There
are some who argue based on the European Commission’s (EC) communications that
in the event of no deal the EU will force a WA treaty on the UK before trade
talks. I find this unlikely as member states would be confronting the economic and security
damage from the UK’s departure and the impact on their own electorate.
The short-term
outcome in my opinion would be a bare bones FTA / other agreements to keep
trade and security locked down with the EU stating clearly that a more complex FTA
possibly covering services would be conditional on a resolution for NI. It is
worth noting that Ireland has a veto on all trade treaties anyway.
Conclusion
Being honest I find the likelihood of a no deal Brexit extremely low due to the level of trust within the EU and between the UK and EU. It would require diplomatic engagement which has long since disappeared and require leadership from member states who have abjectly failed to step up and engage.
Being honest I find the likelihood of a no deal Brexit extremely low due to the level of trust within the EU and between the UK and EU. It would require diplomatic engagement which has long since disappeared and require leadership from member states who have abjectly failed to step up and engage.
It would
need this high-level engagement to ensure that stand still arrangements were
activated on time and that the EC which has set the clear objective of punishing
the UK to be put on a short leash whilst the Council of ministers dealt with it.
Failure to do so could generate some short-term pain on both sides of the
channel but especially within the Eurozone due to the fragility of its economy
and banking sector (Link).
To my mind
we find ourselves in a classic prisoner’s dilemma with many on both sides realizing
that no deal would generate the best medium / long term outcome but lacking the
political will and or belief that the other will also move in the same
direction.
Hence we
are likely to get a far more unstable conclusion which will impact economic,
political and security ties just as the world economy begins tipping over into
a recession.
Depressing.
Comments
Post a Comment